Sunday, January 09, 2005

When Reality Trumps Fiction

I just can't seem to get off this Bizarro World kick that I'm on. Frank Rich brings the bizarroness of it all into a little more perspective with a great column in this morning's NYT.

Go read. We'll talk later.



Ok, I've had my first morning cup 'o joe, and though I'm going to be offline for most of the day, I decided to quickly update my Bizzaro World post that was originally written back in September. With yesterday's news of ressurecting the Central American "death squad" model in Iraq, coupled with Frank Rich's column, and a taste of Richard Clarke's upcoming Atlantic Monthly article (courtesy of PW at Prairie Weather), I'm feeling very uneasy today, and this particular post seems to fit the mood.



There are times when I feel like someone must have spiked the national water supply with a dose of really bad acid. You come home at night, turn on the news, and another 20 Iraqis have died from a car bomb attack or 8 American soldiers get blown up in a Bradley fighting vehicle by a roadside bomb, yet an Army general crows about soldiers "getting better at bomb detection". 200+ people get blown up in a school and two airplanes get blown out of the sky in Russia, and our government tells their's that they should "consider the Chechen rebel's grievances". A quiet genocide of an entire race of people is taking place in Sudan while the world stands by and watches, and U.S. Secretary of State stands mute. We see pictures of naked men stacked in a pyramid in a dark foreign jail corridor, or forced to masturbate with a West Virginny girl smiling and pointing with a Marlboro hanging out of her mouth, or hooded and caped with electrodes connected to testicles and nipples.

And we grimace and change the channel.

The average American worker is much worse off economically than they were four years ago, and 45,000,000 Americans fly without the net of healthcare coverage. The U.S. government gets in bed with drug manufacturers, sticks the taxpayer with a tab of $500,000,000,000 ($100 Billion of that hidden from lawmakers by a bureaucratic aparatchik under orders from the Bush administration). Not one person goes to jail.

3000 lives are lost on American soil in a single day to terrorist ambitions, and the President of the United States spends SEVEN FULL MINUTES during the attack flipping through a kids book with a goofy grin on his face. The cover-up of the My Pet Goat story is more robust than the fact finding on the attack itself. And the guy who shows us this bizarroness in a movie is vilified more than POTUS. Not one single person in the government, a government that is chartered first and foremost with protecting its citizens, is fired in the wake of the events of 9/11/01. And even at the beginning of 2005, not one single person sits in a jail cell, anywhere in the world, convicted or awaiting trial for the crime.

A war hero running for President is crucified on the cross of public opinion, and a military deserter is hailed as the Caesar who will lead the nation to righteous victory against the godless brown skinned sandmonkeys.

Yet here we sit as a nation, blindly accepting the bizarre circumstances that the past four years have brought, simply because fully half of the electorate in the country can't get past the indiscretion of Bill Clinton's dick.



Many years ago, I was told that an alcoholic has to hit rock bottom before they realize that they're as low as they can go. Some addicts survive bottoming out, some don't. For those that make it, the bounce off the bottom might hurt like hell, but in many cases it's the only way someone in those circumstances can start going up again.

We're at that point as a nation that's drunk on it's own power and short history.

A thousand years from now, I believe our heirs will look back at the past dawn of a new millennium, and see the next 50 or 100 years as a turning point in the history of the human race. They'll chuckle when they read that the ruling oiligarchy (sic) of the most powerful nation on the planet was beholden to a religious sect that plied its trade (and made their personal fortunes) in advancing the belief that the prophecies in the Book of Revelations would be fulfilled during their lifetimes.

In the big scheme of things, and maybe even in the short run, it probably doesn't make a damn bit of difference who's running the imperial show -- at least as long as we continue to maintain the status quo. One thousand years from now, will it make a difference who America chose as its leader on November 2, 2004? While I'd like to think so, probably not.

Still, I remained selfishly a supporter of John Kerry during his presidential run, partly because I'm a 50 year old Democrat, but mostly because I felt Kerry was the best immediate chance I have of seeing 55 without experiencing some serious mushroom clouding at various locations on the planet. Yet there are nights when I think that there has to be a globally defining event that drives the human race to reconsider the stewardship of itself, and it doesn't make a damn bit of difference who's in charge when the shit hits the fan.

Sometimes, as I sit in quiet contemplation late at night, I think about the next quantum leap that the human race must take to survive to the next millennium. It's hard to imagine how we make such a leap, though there's certainly no lack of philosophically progressive vision on how to get there from here.

What we progressives are lacking in our common quest for a path out of Bizarro World is a true leader who will step forward and unblur the lines of differences between true progressives, "vichy liberals", and those who would lead us back to the dark ages. As winter gives way to spring over the next few months, I think such a leader will begin to emerge from the background, driven into the open by events and circumstance rather than opportunism.

We can only hope that the emergence of such a leader occurs as a result of organic political development rather than a catastrophic step-change in world history.

It's kind of funny how the concept of "hope" is such an exclusively human attribute, isn't it? In this time of bizarroness, cling to it.

Because it's all we've got right now.

Saturday, January 08, 2005

Plan 9 From Outer Space

At least the right guy is in place in Iraq to handle this latest brain fart from the Rumsfeld/Wolfowitz/Feith cabal:

NEW YORK (Reuters) - The Pentagon is debating whether to set up elite hit-squads to target leaders of the Iraq insurgency in a new strategy based on tactics used against leftist guerrillas in Central America 20 years ago, Newsweek magazine reported on Saturday.

One proposal would send U.S. Special Forces teams to advise, support and possibly train Iraqi squads of hand-picked Kurdish Peshmerga fighters and Shiite militiamen to target Sunni insurgents and their sympathizers, Newsweek said, citing military insiders familiar with the discussions.

The squads may operate across the border in Syria, Newsweek said on its web site, but added it was unclear whether they would assassinate leaders or be involved in "snatch" operations.

The magazine said the plan is being called "the Salvador option" after strategy instigated during the Reagan administration's battle against the leftist guerrilla insurgency in El Salvador in the early 1980s...

The more things change, the more they remain the same. This whole operation is becoming more and more like a bad "B" movie. Yep, death squads are right up Iraq Ambassador John Negroponte's alley.

More here.

YCMTSU*, Volume 57,237

You all remember the letter Blackwell sent out to Republicans patting himself on the back for "delivering Ohio" to Bush on election night. That self-congratulatory letter that shows his kneepads, emblazoned with the Bush/Cheney '04 logo, stained from all the use they'd gotten in the last election. The letter that Blackwell uses to pimp himself, as a guy who "never bowed to political pressure and stuck to my guns.", while soliciting contributions for his run for governor -- while the Ohio recount was still ongoing.

It seems there is a problem with that letter, beyond its timing and crassness. Mr. Blackwell was soliciting illegal contributions* from corporate donors. (*Look for the double asteriks under the amount to donate list. What is it with Republicans and Loyalty Pledges?)

Ohio Letter Seeks Illegal Contributions
A pledge card with the letter from Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell, a Republican who co-chaired the Bush-Cheney election campaign in Ohio, said "corporate & personal checks are welcome."

Corporate donations are illegal in Ohio.
...
Blackwell said the request sent to GOP donors and activists was an oversight. His campaign's fund-raising coordinator, Jeff Ledbetter, blamed a printer for the mistake, saying it used a template for an issue committee, which is allowed to accept corporate donations.

Riiiiight. But wait for it, the best part is coming:

Blackwell has maintained that he is permitted to campaign for Bush and that Ohio's election system has checks and balances to ensure fair elections.

"I have an obligation to follow the law," Blackwell said.

Why don't I believe that he fulfills his obligations to the law? Could it be because he is too busy fulfilling his "obligations" to Bush?

Update: The BradBlog, is also covering Blackwell's campaign whorage. Is it legal to use "official looking" government stationary to pimp yourself for office?

The "Honorable Kenneth Blackwell". Riiiiiiiight.

*Another from the "You Can't Make This Shit Up" department.

Armstrong Williams : Conflicts of Interest

Have you been following the Armstrong Williams saga that's developed over the past 24 - 48 hours? In a nutshell, Williams is an African American conservative commentator - his syndicated televison show airs in quite a few markets, apparently (though I've never watched it).

Turns out he's been accepting payola from the Department of Education to shill the No Child Left Behind Act in the black community - to the tune of about a quarter million dollars. You may already be familiar with the background of the controversy, but just in case, this from USA Today:

Seeking to build support among black families for its education reform law, the Bush administration paid a prominent black pundit $240,000 to promote the law on his nationally syndicated television show and to urge other black journalists to do the same.

The campaign, part of an effort to promote No Child Left Behind (NCLB), required commentator Armstrong Williams "to regularly comment on NCLB during the course of his broadcasts," and to interview Education Secretary Rod Paige for TV and radio spots that aired during the show in 2004.

Well, as time has marched on over the past day or so, the distributor of his syndicated show has dropped him like a hot potato. Good on them. The conflict of interest is certainly very clear - and if Bob Vila can get dropped from "This Old House" for shilling Craftsman tools, certainly a political commentator can get dropped for accepting money to push a point of view under the guise of personal commentary.

Conservative or liberal, all appearance of independent thought falls by the wayside when stuff like this bubbles up from the shadows into the light of day. And it makes you ask the question: how many other "commentators" are being paid by government agencies to spin a particular message?

I have a gut feeling that Williams is just the first one outted (for whatever reason; perhaps he pissed off the wrong person). If we take a tinfoil hat view of this controversy, consider that he's a relatively small fish in a big pond.

While a lot of blogs have commented extensively on le affaire de Armstrong in the past day or so (with progressive African American blogger Steve Gilliard leading the way and taking a lot of flack), no one seems to be asking the most important question. The outting of Williams by conservative operatives was clearly a horse head under the sheets to someone else of more significant stature.

Who?

Just Call Me Sparky!

Way back when I was in elementary school corporal punishment was an accepted practice. Most of the "standard" behavior modification methods were employed before implementing The Paddle. Most of you "old geezers" are probably familiar with these behavior modification techniques:

1. The notorious penmanship enhancement exercise:
I will not shoot spitballs. I will not shoot spitballs. I will not shoot spitballs.
2. Sitting out in the hall.
3. Detention.
4. A trip to the principal's office, and a good "talkin' to".

If none of these modifiers had the desired effect of improving your behavior out came The Paddle and a few swift swats were dealt. On rare occasions the student would be suspended or expelled, depending on the severity of the infraction.

Before I reached high school the state removed corporal punishment from the teachers arsenal. Striking a student in anyway, or with anything was not allowed.

It seems that we've come full circle -- and then some. In the past months there have been at least three six cases in Florida of students being tasered in Florida schools, the youngest student was 6.

Here's how Tom Smith President of Taser International, Inc. defends the use of tasers on children:

Smith said the stun guns are safe. He said if there was ever a situation where police had to use force to subdue his 3-year-old and 5-year-old children, he would prefer them to use the Taser before pepper spray or the baton.

What a sick, sick, sick fucker. What possible justification is there to use a Taser, pepper spray or baton to subdue a 3 or 5 year old child? There isn't any. If an adult cannot control any situation with a 3 or 5 year old (or a child of any age) without resorting to physical abuse or violence they have no business being around children.

Sen. Tony Hill, D-Jacksonville, is introducing a bill to ban the use of tasers in schools. Meanwhile, Duval County to equip school officers with Tasers.

Some school officials are surprised by the action, saying they were never told by the Jacksonville Sheriff's Office that it planned to issue stun guns to the officers assigned to most middle and high schools.

The Jacksonville Sheriff's Office has signed a $1.8 million contract with Taser International to buy 1,800 Tasers over the next two years.

If Tasers are allowed now, what's next? Rubber bullets? Real bullets? Naked butt pyramids?

Update: In Texas strip searching 11 and 12 year olds is the new thing.

Ten students between the ages of 11 and 12 were strip-searched as officials at their charter school tried to find a missing $10 bill.
...
"It's not illegal," La Marque Police Chief Richard Price said. "We don't see it as a criminal offense." But he said an investigation was underway.

What the fuck is WRONG with these people?

Sick fuckers. We are so screwed!

Friday, January 07, 2005

Teach Your Children Well

Their parents' hell will slowly go by...



Or not. The madness. That the adult human beings of my generation are allowing the government to lie to their children leaves me nearly speechless. (Okay. I'm rarely speechless.) That each and every one of my cohort generation has not already schooled their children in the idiocy of enlisting in the military leaves me crying out to the bartender for another double vodka. But yet, here it is. Yet again fresh from the New York Times, no less... Leave No Sales Pitch Behind (Use this if you need to from BugMeNot: login: nty42322; password: nty42322)
"Hard-pressed recruiters have stepped up the sales pitch to meet wartime manpower shortages. One sergeant filmed by the NewsHour on PBS recently sounded like a salesman from David Mamet's Glengarry Glen Ross as he exhorted a campus group: "I mean, where else can you get paid to jump out of airplanes, shoot cool guns, blow stuff up and travel, seeing all kinds of different countries?""

Whoopie! Your children can be the government fodder in their own personal Oval Office action video! The ShrubCo cabal has managed to push its way, via the lying piece of shit No Child Left Behind Act... mother of the Cosmos help us!!!! ... is there no irony left in the world?... into schools for the purposes of recruiting YOUR children. YOURS. But take heart. They can get a spiffy uniform, learn to shoot (not a bad thing), learn to hate and kill the enemy, and anybody else close by, and get nearly unredeemable money for college. Yes, Mom and Dad, your babies. You too can have a star hanging from your front room window.

I feel like we're under the insane influence of some runamok Wayback Machine. Where is Mr. Peabody when you need him? This is 2005, isn't it? It's not 1965, right? I do know better, because my own sister sold both her sons out to UnclefuckingSam in the late 80s and 90s, 'cos she didn't want to bother with them, or in her abject denial thought it would be "good" for them. Another story, another sideways rant.

So, do you want your high schoolers proselytized and promoted by the military hucksters? No? Would you rather have them grow up without PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder) for the rest of their lives? Or do you think your lovelies will never see combat? You might want to rethink that based on what's happening with the "Natural", I mean National Guard and reserve troops... You want the apple of your eye to pull a two-year stint in Iraq?

Mom and Dad. I'm giving you the advice that Nancy Reagan gave. Just say no! says Hulkette in a roar, her normal tone of voice.

And for Sir Richard: We are so screwed!
Updating and editing as the spirit moves me.
For example: I've just removed the extra "o"s from "soooo" to conform with the requirements of the Google bomb. ;-)

Sandy Says: Don't Forget

Yeah, we're lobbying like two-bit DC beltway bandits to make it to the final round of the Koufax Awards. Our GOTV strategy is sleazy, personally degrading, and cheapens the whole process. That's why we figure our approach is in complete harmony with the political feng shui of 2005. ASZ has been nominated in the following categories:

Best Blog

Best Group Blog

Vote early, vote often. Bribes No-bid contracts will be awarded when the finalists are posted. We promise. The check is in the mail.

Update!: ASZ could use your help -- after a flurry of initial recommendations, we're sucking some major wind - I mean, really - Anatopia's getting more action. Sukabi has printed up a fresh batch of Washington's in recognition of our ardent supporters. Get in while the gettin's good. Stuff the ballot box. Whatever. Because if you don't...

We are so screwed.

Bush Inauguration - Opportunity Knocks

As the magnitude of the tragedy in the Indian Ocean countries has unfolded, a unique opportunity has also developed for George Bush to show true leadership and statesmanship. Which is precisely why the opportunity will never be realized.

The opportunity? Cancel or scale back inauguration festivities. It's simply not the time for a Queer Eye for the Straight Guy gala. Never mind that the big money boys and girls will be partying in the wake of 200,000-plus dead and/or missing souls in the tsunami affected areas. And, based on the administration's own predictions, U.S. soldiers will be at the apex of risk in a pre-election Iraq. Lastly, without question, Washington DC itself will be ripe for anti-administration induced chaos.

Nope, it's not a good time for a coronation, but the show must go on.

What a real leader would do is conduct a quiet swearing in ceremony, and within minutes get back to the business of state. But then, it's already been established that benevolent leadership and global statesmanship is not high on BushCo's priority list.

Don't expect anyone associated with the party planning to have second thoughts about how the grandiose coronation ceremonies will play in the rest of the world. The Bush administration has never much cared about what the rest of the world thinks, anyway -- unless a U.N. representative criticizes something done (or not done) by Bush or one of "his people".

Perhaps sometime during the coronation festivities, Maximum Leader could bestow himself with the Royal Order of Marie Antoinette award (double clusters, of course, for the second term).

We are so screwed.

Update 8:30PM - here's a few bizarro coronation links you might like:

Hat for Bush's inauguration to feature solid gold 'W' buckle
Atheist Sues to Thwart Inauguration Prayer
Leader of AIDS group helps coordinate Bush inauguration (not what you think...)
Forget Iraq and South Asia, It's Party Time

Your Tax Dollars at Work in Sri Lanka

According to CBS News, Bill Frist and Mary Landrieu are on a "fact-finding" mission, utilizing two helicopters which could have been ferrying over much-needed supplies to devastated citizens in Sri Lanka.

I suppose we could congratulate this bi-partisan support of the relief efforts if, first, they weren't getting in the way, and second, if Frist weren't such a media-hungry JERK!

Just before his helicopter lifted off, Frist and aides took snapshots of each other near a pile of tsunami debris.

"Get some devastation in the back," Frist told a photographer.

Thanks to Taegan Goddard for the tip.

Yeah, the Majority Leader of the Senate is caught showing more concern about the photo op than about the victims of this tragedy.

We are so screwed.

Thanks Barbara Boxer

And you can all thank her as well, right here. And go to the Grand Lake Theater Marquee to see a really great tribute to Senator Boxer.

That's all I've got for now. A quickie thanks for Barbara Boxer for putting herself out there for all of us.

So, it's a Holy War...

But then, you knew that all along:

Why do the terrorists fear democracy? In a remarkable statement recently, the Ansar al-Sunnah Army and two other insurgent groups dropped all the self-serving double-talk and self-righteous excuses for slaughtering innocents. They spelled out their fear and hatred — and ignorance — of democracy. They made clear their campaign is not simply to thwart American interests — it is to thwart the Iraqi people.

“Democracy is a Greek word meaning the rule of the people, which means that the people do what they see fit,” the statement said. “This concept is considered apostasy and defies the belief in one God — Muslims’ doctrine.”

There is no point in arguing theology with fanatics who find in holy books the rationale to kill by the thousands. No amount of reasoning will change their twisted minds, no logic will sway them from their warped beliefs about what they believe their religion demands. Suffice to say Islam and democracy can flourish, side by side, as neighboring Turkey demonstrates...

Read this quote again: There is no point in arguing theology with fanatics who find in holy books the rationale to kill by the thousands. Tell that to Falwell.

We are so screwed.

Turn Your Back on Bush

These folks are doing a protest on Inauguration Day, so I thought I'd tip my cap to www.turnyourbackonbush.org.

I also heard of an economic protest all of us who can't go to Washington can take part in. It's about not spending one dime on Inauguration Day. Does anyone know about that action?

Edit: Kate identifies Not One Damn Dime Day correctly. And here's sukabi's link.

Yeah, but...

I can't tell you how many times I've heard statements essentially similar to this in the past weeks / months / years:

...Just three weeks before the vote, the commander of U.S. ground forces in Iraq acknowledged that security is poor in four of 18 Iraqi provinces. But Lt. Gen. Thomas Metz told a briefing in the capital that delaying the vote would only increase the danger.

I'm not of the mind to dig through the archives right at this moment, but saying "security is poor in four of 18" is varnished bullshit. Yesterday, I was doing a bit of news mining, and reports of explosions, ambushes, and general lawlessness were documented in almost every area Iraq - north, south, east, west. Border to border.

Even assuming "4 of 18", those four (according to an NPR report this morning) comprise the most populous areas of Iraq, home to over 50% of the Iraqi occupation, including Baghdad itself and Mosul.

I said before that I have no doubt that the vote will go forward, because Maximum Leader says it must. He / we / Iraqis are in a damned if we do damned if we don't situation right now.

Allawi and Bush are right about one thing: violence will continue to increase prior to the election (as they have accurately predicted in advance of every milestone in Iraq). Once the election is held, it's a fairly safe bet that things will escalate even further.

We are so screwed.

Iraq: How Bad Is It?

It's bad and getting worse. In fact, Rumsfeld has apparently finally decided we'd better look into just how damn bad it is.

And, here's a link to an article from the "where the hell has the press been?" file. A National Intelligence Estimate and a report from UK's Chatham House 8 months ago wasn't good enough? Oh, I forgot. Reporters would actually have to read, research, and digest information, rather than press the "record" icon on their iPods.

[dope slapping forehead] What the hell was I thinking?

We are so screwed.

Thursday, January 06, 2005

Intelligent Design


This whole "intelligent design" thing is really starting to get on the one remaining nerve I have in my body.

You're not hep to the concept? It's easy -- "intelligent design" (ID) is a fundamentalist code phrase for biblical creationism. And it's creeping into the science curriculum at a taxpayer supported public school district near you:

PHILADELPHIA - A Pennsylvania school district on Wednesday rejected charges that plans to include references to an alternative to Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution in high-school biology classes would be illegal.

The Dover Area School District near Harrisburg is the first in the United States to introduce “intelligent design,” a concept proposing that the natural world is so complex it must have been made by an intelligent being, into a science curriculum.

Listen, we already know that the Bush Administration and its core support groups are adamantly opposed to any advancement of scientific endeavor (unless said development will cure erectile dysfunction in aging legislators or fundamentalist clergy). So, why ID?

SCOTUS ruled sometime back that creationism can't be taught as a scientific counterpoint to Darwin's theories in public school systems, because creationism is biblically based hypothesis and would violate the constitutional precept of separation of church and state. The upshot of the ruling was: if a parent wanted their child to learn about creationism, well and good, send the kid to Sunday School class at church. Sounds reasonable to me. As a taxpaying parent, I want my kid to learn about scientific concepts based on empirical evidence and observation, not mysticism and incantations. Still, if we're actually going to take this route, well then, we need to at least be inclusive:

First, if we're going to teach intelligent design as an alternative to evolution, then why not also teach the Chinese creation myth in which P'an Ku grew inside a gigantic, cosmic egg.

And, here's the kicker. In every instance when creationism-v-evolution has been brought before a high court, evolution wins, with the proviso that a parent objecting to teaching of Darwin's theory can exclude their child from the class (at no penalty). So what's the fooking problem?

The problem is: this wasn't good enough for the fundamentalists. In case you missed it, the fundies have organized and staged (once again) a quiet coup of many local school boards, the state-level mechanism for approval of textbooks, and state mandated educational curriculum development. They want the children to be saved.

So, they dressed creationism up in a new suit: Intelligent Design.

These guys are like the Taliban. I've bloviated here previously on how Muslim culture has an institutional memory that spans generations rather than the latest fashion trend at Hot Topic. The fundie movement is no different. They were more than willing to wait a generation, until the kindygarders of the '80s became the graduating class of the new millennia. And now they're springing the trap on the MTV generation parents whose kids are just starting to mainstream into the public education system.

Intelligent design, indeed.

Listen, I'm old enough to be very comforted by the fact that my kids are, for all intents and purposes, out of the public school system at this point. Still, I'm really concerned about what this means in the years and decades going forward.

By America's quiet acquiescence to this educational devolution, of which ID is just the tip of the iceberg, are we enabling at least a generation of scientific endeavor to be skipped?

Reference points: Return of the Hut People (independentreport.org); Panda's Thumb (a resource devoted to slaying the ID dragon)

Senators Challenge Ohio Vote

For the live feed links and blow by blow coverage of the Senate Challenge of the Ohio votes Brad of Brad Blog is your man.

Here's a link to the C-Span coverage.

The Dems are alive.

Liars Club

January 6, 2005:

...Gonzales repudiated torture tactics and vowed at a contentious confirmation hearing to abide by international treaties on prisoner rights. 'I will no longer represent only the White House. I will represent the United States of America and its people. I understand the difference between the two roles."

September 15, 2004:

"I have a commitment to nonpartisanship," said Goss, who conceded that "at times, perhaps, I engaged in debate with a little too much vigor or enthusiasm."

The Pitch

In the entertainment and literary industries, they call it "the pitch". All writers, artists, filmmakers, and other entrepreneurs understand the need for a short, concise description of their endeavor as they seek funding or sponsorship. "The pitch" has to be framed and loaded with emotive words to convince the buyer that they must buy the product -- and quickly, before someone else gets in line in front of them or the buyer has second thoughts.

Turns out that the Whitehouse has (no surprise) some master pitchmen operating within the walls of the West Wing. A Karl Rove protege, Peter Wehner, is the architect of the full court press on disemboweling Social Security. If you have any doubts that the BushCo plan for the overall social safety net, developed over the past 60 or 70 years, is not simply to "reform" Social Security but to use any such pretense of reform as anything other than a jumping off point for dismantling all social programs and safety nets, read this:

Calling the effort "one of the most important conservative undertakings of modern times," Peter Wehner, the deputy to White House political director Karl Rove, says in the e-mail message that a battle over Social Security is winnable for the first time in six decades and could transform the political landscape.

More of that "alternate reality" creation.

"We have it within our grasp to move away from dependency on government and toward giving greater power and responsibility to individuals," said Wehner, the director of White House Strategic Initiatives. He called the Democratic Party the "party of obstruction and opposition. It is the Party of the Past."

Yep. When you're 70, your compassionate conservative government will give you the responsibility for finding your own cardboard box to live in - or squarely put that responsibility with your children when you can no longer support yourself. After all, you supported those little suckers when they were growing up, right? So, a little geriatric tit-for-tat is their birthright now.

"We need to establish in the public mind a key fiscal fact: right now we are on an unsustainable course," the e-mail said. "That reality needs to be seared into the public consciousness; it is the precondition to authentic reform."

When did the word "fact" become a synonym for "sales point"? Yesterday, I blogged about Paul Krugman becoming, in essence, one of the key debunkers of the pitchmen in the Whitehouse on the issue of Social Security. Subject matter experts (such as Krugman) in the reality-based world are starting to jump on the "facts" and get them out to the public.

But will it ultimately matter?

In my earlier posting on Social Security, I opined that the entire issue is a smokescreen for something much bigger. After making that post, conducting some more research, and recalling a news report I heard recently about Pennsylvania state taxes, the fog started lifting a bit.

Medicare. Medicaid.

Now, there's two programs that are really in serious trouble. But the interesting thing is, both of those programs entail some degree of cost sharing with the individual states. Every state in the union is struggling to fund its portion of these programs right now -- and there's just no way to do it without significant cutting of benefits and / or tax hikes at the state level.

Take a gander at your next paystub, and look at how much is going directly to Medicare / Medicaid.

I'm starting to think (though I haven't had the time to research or completely flesh out the thought yet) that the entire Social Security dustup is a public relations Trojan horse to set the stage for eliminating two medical programs which are (substantially) utilized by the poor and elderly. Shift the total responsibility back to the states, and the federal government has, in essence, plausible deniability for any failure in Medicare / Medicaid system.

Whener's code words, "giving greater power and responsibility to individuals" take on much deeper meaning when framed in the context of other social programs that have been developed by our (largely) progressive society over the past hundred years.

This isn't just about Social Security. It's about pitchmen and hucksters trying to sell you a 12 ounce bottle of social snakeoil now, so it'll be easier to convince you to upgrade to the 55 gallon drum later.

Update, 2:45PM - if you need a playbook to figure out which congresscritter to chase with a pitchfork on Social Security, Josh Marshall has been following the issue very closely, and has compiled a target list of prime suspects.

Tucker Carlson is OUT!

Jon Stewart is my HERO!

Today's news, and the following is from the New York Times article (I saw it in the Philadelphia Inquirer), shows that CNN has decided to part ways with Mr. Carlson, and that they are cancelling "Crossfire," that granddaddy of the "yammering heads" shows. I guess someone has cottoned to the fact that all those shows consist of regurgitations of party talking points.

No guesses about it. Jonathan Klein, the President of the network, indicates that Jon Stewart's assessment had a whole lot to do with his decision:

Mr. Klein said he wanted to move CNN away from what he called "head-butting debate shows," which have become the staple of much of all-news television in the prime-time hours, especially at the top-rated Fox News Channel.

"CNN is a different animal," Mr. Klein said. "We report the news. Fox talks about the news. They're very good at what they do and we're very good at what we do."

Mr. Klein specifically cited the criticism that the comedian Jon Stewart leveled at "Crossfire" when he was a guest on the program during the presidential campaign. Mr. Stewart said that ranting partisan political shows on cable were "hurting America."

Mr. Klein said last night, "I agree wholeheartedly with Jon Stewart's overall premise." He said he believed that especially after the terror attacks on 9/11, viewers are interested in information, not opinion.

Three cheers for Jon Stewart. Now it would be good if he can go after Sean Hannity, or that yammering head superhero, Falafel Man!

Wednesday, January 05, 2005

YCMUSLT* : Episode 32,453

Screen capture from http://www.newsnow.co.uk (at about 10:45PM):



This would be Leno material if there wasn't the fear that the Bushbots would organize a boycott of Leno in favor of Letterman...

*You Can't Make Up Shit Like This

Someone Likes Us!!

Shock and awe reign in the ASZ village this evening.

All Spin Zone has been nominated for "Best Overall Blog by a Non-Professional" in the Oscar's® of the Left, the Koufax Awards.

As you might expect, there's some pretty heady competition in this category - upstarts and neophytes such as dKos, Eschaton, Hullaballoo, Gilliard, among others. The bottom line is that the top 8 to 10 nominated blogs will compete as finalists for the Koufax.

We won't twist any arms, we won't beg, we won't do your housework, and the bribes are strictly low dollar value in nature. But, in the political spirit of ASZ, we'll ask you to vote early, often, and if you see BUSH show up in the tally window of your electronic voting machine, we'll call in Ken Blackwell to investigate.

Seriously, it's an honor to have been recognized for having come this far enough in such a relatively short period of time. It's a testament to everyone that makes up this community: those who write, those who kibitz comment, and folks who just kind of hang around (we'll call them "the groupies").

Here's the link to the award thread (hint - only list one, whether it's us or another blog - MB, Dwight, and Eric are only looking at the first blog you write in.)

Other categories are expected to be posted shortly...we'll keep you abreast.

Update, 10:35PM: Schnikes, we've been nominated in the Best Group Blog category, too! Oh, our swelled heads...same voting rules apply.

Stand Up, Senators

It's time to stand up and be counted.

Is the right to a fair vote important to you? Does it matter that ALL eligible voters that want to vote are able to participate? How does privatizing the electoral system foster democracy when the companies building, maintaining, and setting up certification tests are controlled by partisan interests who refuse to build transparency and auditability into their voting systems? Do corporate concerns of protecting trade secrets trump the voters right to a fair, non-partisan, transparent, auditable vote?

Where do you stand on these issues Senators?

Do you take it on faith that all is well with the system and that next time will be different? It's time to take off the blinders or stop participating in the sham. There has been ample evidence in the last 3 national elections that something is terribly wrong with the way the elections are run in this country. The old excuse that "it's just politics" has worn thin. Placing the blame for election day "malfunctions" and "irregularities" on the untrained volunteers is tantamount to blaming the US soldiers in Iraq for the lack of planning for the post "liberation" period.

It's not like this is a newly formed country starting from scratch. We've been voting and electing people to office for over 200 years, I think that's plenty of "ramp up" time don't you? There has been ample time to construct a transparent, verifiable, auditable, non-partisan electoral system in this country. Instead the legislation passed by the House and Senate has enabled more unverifiable voting with the passing of HAVA.

Do you accept that "it's just politics", or will you stand up and challenge the vote?

Tomorrow will be an interesting day.

Destroying the Homeland from Within

So, as the old saying goes, you gotta break a few eggs to make an omlette, eh? The General in charge of the U.S. Army reserve forces, Gen. James Helmly (the same guy that forced out Brig. Gen. Janice "Abu Ghraib" Karpinski) has written a scathing memo to his bosses on the readiness of the U.S. Army Reserve, basically telling them that a whole chicken farm full of eggs is broken.

That this non-redacted memo (.pdf file) even saw the light of day is, in and of itself, quite incredible. That an active duty General in the U.S. Army would use such scathing terms such as "dysfunction policy" and "broken force" and "creating mercenaries" in describing the USAR borders on amazing.

Here's a link to the lead-in story from the Baltimore Sun that broke the memo. Note that this memo only discusses the reserve component of the Army - we're left to wonder mightly about impact of readiness on the volunteer active duty force.

Over at Lean Left, Kevin does not feel that the burgeoning problems in the Army will result in a draft:

But a draft is a non-starter. The war was sold as an easy war, and even now, the Bush Administration persist in telling the country that things are going well, that the latest campaign is going to be the one that turns the corner, that the end is in sight, and it will be a glorious end. The people are not prepared for a draft, and no lawmaker wants to be the one who starts the process of educating them.

I disagree. Kevin's hoping for a lot of best case scenario's to develop in order to avoid the need for a full-on conscription that isn't cloaked "stop loss", retention, or re-activation nightmares (the "backdoor draft") currently being experienced by active duty personnel. This is another one of those running chainsaws that the Bush administration is juggling, and it's only a matter of time before it falls.

The Pentagon Wing of the Bush Administration has been playing with fire and is placing the U.S. in incredible jeopardy of its ability to defend real national interests. Without presuming any particular hotspot in the world suddenly catching fire (say, have we heard anything from Kim Jung Il recently?), it's hard not to believe that the readiness of our armed forces to respond to another flareup in the world, or even on our own shores, has been tremendously diminished by the military follies of this administration.

From a cave in an undisclosed location somewhere near the Khyber Pass, laughter is heard...

U. S. Soldiers and Relief Work

Look at those faces as the United States Marines lower food and water to children on Sumatra. Sure, we've seen griping about the Bush effort, which took maybe three times as long to crank into gear as the Clinton efforts vis a vis the Turkish earthquakes of 1999. We've seen the public pressure brought to bear to make the Bush estimate expenditures go from $15 Million to $35 Million and then to $350 Million. Yeah, they are slow on the uptake, all right -- this Administration supposedly informed, if not ruled, by the Christian right, makes all Christians look bad. But let's focus on the soldiers. They are doing good work, and they are a HELL OF A LOT HAPPIER doing it in response to the Tsunami than they are doing their soldiering in Iraq:

U.S. military crews are launching more than 100 helicopter flights a day from the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln ferrying food, water and medicine to tsunami victims, a task they say is far more satisfactory than the Iraq war that seems only to destroy.

"Oh yeah, no doubt," said U.S. Navy helicopter pilot Rachel Brainard. "Here we're helping people, not destroying things."

"It's the greatest thing to see all the smiling faces when we're taking off," she said on Tuesday.

"They were so happy and grateful because they had nothing," said Airman Emily Aleiwe...

War supporters predicted Iraqis would be so happy to get rid of Saddam they would greet U.S. soldiers as conquering heroes, but instead violent Iraqi resistance has bogged down the U.S.-led effort.

"At least here we know it's for a good cause. In Iraq we don't know what the outcome is going to be," said Airman Kimberly Kolar.

"I don't feel like I've done anything this meaningful in my life," said Airman Carlos Lobo after a day working onshore in Indonesia to deliver aid.

I'm amazed that these soldiers spoke on the record, but not at the content of what they say. Let's not forget, we've got damned fine men and women in the field. They're just led by a bunch of power-hungry scumbags.

Reason for thinking positive

Remember when the Righties were predicting the doom of Air America? I certainly remember tons of talk about how progressives would fail miserably with Talk Radio, most of it based on false premises, as with Jay Severin of the Boston Globe here in Late March of '04:
You are planning to lure conservative talk listeners? Dream on. You ignore -- or are delusional about -- the gross mismatch between your product and your customers.

Your ethos, mantra, unshakeable article of faith, and every utterance will derive from the smug presumption that the values and views of nonliberals are the root of evil: "selfish" because we believe our taxes too high; "haters" because we disdain racial preferences and same-sex marriage; "cruel" because we believe in strong national defense, capital punishment, and actually oppose illegal immigration; and, of course, "stupid" because we reject your benighted viewpoint.

Harsh words, and undeniably the wrong way to examine whether progressive talk radio will work. It IS working because folks like Randi Rhodes and Al Franken are talking sense in an entertaining way. Yeah, those two just got their contracts renewed, and instead of the handful of stations they started out with they are up to 40 nationwide.

Perhaps the real star is Ed Schultz. At the close of his first year of going National he's now on 70 stations, and the expansion of his audience continues. I was lucky to catch him on the Charlston, SC station a bit over two weeks ago, and he's engaging without being shrill and without the over-the-top showmanship (blowhardism?) of Rush Limbaugh.

There's lots of room to grow. Tune in, folks.

The Lost Stooge

What fucking planet is this guy living on??? They lock up and medicate people in New York City with lesser delusions.

Robert Fisk on Perpetuating the Lie

Are we dealing with just a few bad actors in the Middle East - or is the whole situation in Iraq the grandchild of the Israeli / Palestinian conflict? Robert Fisk offers some surprising thoughts, framed in a manner that rarely sees the print of publication on the U.S. side of the pond.

Here's a snippet to whet your appetite:

My own calculations--probably conservative, because there are many violent acts that we are never told about -suggest that in the past 12 months, at least 190 suicide bombers have blown themselves up, sometimes at the rate of two a day. How does this happen? Is there a suicide-bomber supermarket, an off-the-shelf store? What have we done to create this extraordinary industry? Time was, in Lebanon, when a suicide bombing was a once-a-month event. Or in Palestine/Israel a once-a-week event. Now, in Iraq, it is daily or twice daily.

You can almost read between the lines of the piece that Fisk feels the entire Iraq debacle is little more than an escalation of the Israeli / Palestinian conflict, with the U.S. acting as a proxy for Israel in the war.

One of cornerstones of Fisk's hypothesis is that Saddam was a strong supporter of the Palestinian quest for a homeland (sidebar: see how that word should really be used?). I don't know how much more evidence anyone would need to draw the same conclusion if they went back and reviewed tapes of Scud missiles falling in Tel Aviv during Gulf War I. Even though the Middle East is comprised of many individual nation-states, in effect (from a cultural perspective), those nations are a single pan-Arabic nation, and they react as such to the pan-Arabic news that they see or read. And if there's a single cause that unites most people in these individual nation-states in solidarity, it's the Palestinian question.

Though the Bush administration and Iraqi puppet dictator Iyad Allawi continue to marginalize the message of bin-Laden and his ilk to the Western world, the message plays louder in the Arabic community every day, and comes back to that single, unifying cause. Most Americans will never read Fisk's column. They'll never see this piece from Dahr Jamail on the sacking of Fallujah (but you can bet that folks in Baghdad, Cairo, Riyadh, and Tehran have).

And they'll never realize, much as T.E. Lawrence did almost 100 years ago in British colonial Iraq:

Things have been far worse than we have been told, our administration more bloody and inefficient that the public knows... We are today not far from a disaster.

Still, it took another 25 years from the time that Lawrence wrote those prophetic words for them to sink into the British post-colonial consciousness.

Update, 12:50PM: Here's a link to a great column on CounterPunch wondering how photos and filmage from Iraq can be "sanitized for your tender sensibilities", but tsunami coverage is not.

Blowing Open the 3 Card Monte Scheme

In my channel surfing of the cable propaganda networks last week, I noted that economist and NYT columnist Paul Krugman ripped into a blow dried talking head on CNBC regarding the latest BushCo three card monte scheme: dismantling Social Security. Today, Krugman pens the first of (apparently) several pieces debunking the myth.

The column, while fairly short and simplistic, is the type of brief soundbite to which people pay attention. Plus, it will no doubt get Krugman some nice on-air gigs over the next few months. This is a good thing. We need his hairy face front and center in this battle.

Here's the summary of his column from today (use bugmenot.com if you're not registered at the NYT site):

There are two serious threats to the federal government's solvency over the next couple of decades. One is the fact that the general fund has already plunged deeply into deficit, largely because of President Bush's unprecedented insistence on cutting taxes in the face of a war. The other is the rising cost of Medicare and Medicaid.

As a budget concern, Social Security isn't remotely in the same league. The long-term cost of the Bush tax cuts is five times the budget office's estimate of Social Security's deficit over the next 75 years. The botched prescription drug bill passed in 2003 does more, all by itself, to increase the long-run budget deficit than the projected rise in Social Security expenses.

That doesn't mean nothing should be done to improve Social Security's finances. But privatization is a fake solution to a fake crisis.

And Krugman didn't even get into the Pension Guarantee Board, which is about broke and represents a much larger eminent threat to upcoming retirees. Bottom line - the whole issue is a smokescreen for something much bigger. Much, much bigger. Much more costly. That's the only reason BushCo would need such a huge media distraction.

Tuesday, January 04, 2005

Aw, C'mon, Wolf. One Sip Won't Kill You.


(Cheap laugh blogging. I just couldn't resist. Via Corrente.)

Admin Note: Phila. Drinking Liberally

Richard and SpinDentist will be at the Philadelphia chapter of Drinking Liberally tonight - if you're in the area, stop in and buy us a beer!

Where: Ten Stone
Address: 21st and South St.
Time: 6 - ?

(I know this is late, but the group gets together every Tuesday evening, and you don't need an engraved invitation to join us. As they say at the bar, yer money is green.) :^p

Lousy, Lousy Headline Writer

From this morning's Boston Globe:

Bomber of US mess hall said to be Saudi student

Allow me to rewrite:

Mosul Mess Hall Bomber Related to Saudi 9/11 Hijacker Clan

...Asharq al-Awsat said Ghamdi started studying medicine in Sudan when his father worked and lived there. Ghamdi stayed to complete his studies when his family returned to Saudi Arabia, the paper reported, without saying when the family left.

It said the father said that he learned Dec. 16 that his son had withdrawn all the money left in a Sudanese bank account for him and that he later received a call from his son telling him he was in Iraq to fight the Americans.

The Ghamdis are a large Saudi clan, three members of whom were among the Sept. 11 hijackers.

Smoke :: Fire

Nothing to see here; move along, citizen.

Update, 2:25P - Sean at Art Pottery, Politics, and Food picks up the scent as well...

Is It a Quagmire Yet?

And so it goes...:

01/04/05 AP: Military says five Americans killed in Iraq attacks
A roadside bombing killed three soldiers today in Baghdad. The blast also wounded two soldiers, another roadside bombing north of Baghdad killed a soldier and wounded another. Also a Marine was killed in action in the western Anbar province

01/04/05 BBC: Three Britons die in Iraq attacks
Two of the victims worked for US security company Kroll, while the third worked for one of its clients, business consulting company BearingPoint. A fourth person, an American civilian, also died in the attack.

01/04/05 iribnews: Bomb blast in Baghdad kills ten
truck bombing Tuesday outside a special Iraqi forces command post in western Baghdad killed 10 people...

01/04/05 Reuters:Baghdad Suicide Car Bomb Kills at Least Four
A suicide car bomb exploded on Tuesday at a police post near an entrance to the fortified Green Zone complex in Baghdad, killing at least four people, a policeman at the scene said

01/04/05 AP: Governor of Baghdad region assassinated
Gunmen assassinated the governor of Baghdad province and six of his bodyguards on Tuesday, and a suicide truck bomber killed 10 people at an Interior Ministry commando headquarters in western Baghdad

(Links to all stories here.)

The "insurgency" grows by the day... the U.S. military is chasing ghosts... the Bush administration continues to refuse to acknowledge that there might be problems conducting the election... the U.S is adding hundreds of American advisers to work directly with Iraqi troops in an attempt to deal with increasing rates of desertion and disappointing performances on the battlefield...

Is it any wonder when people hear or read this stuff anymore, they do the equivalent of sticking their forefingers in their ears and shouting "NEENER NEENER NEENER, I CAN'T HEAR YOU".

I mean, who wants to hear this crap anymore?

Gawd, it's all so depressing sometimes.

The Gonzales Confirmation Hearings - Part 2

Essential morning reading: Richard Cohen in the Washington Post:

...The Bush administration has fused Orwell with Kafka in the same way someone fused the cry of an infant with that of a cat from the Meow Mix television commercial. The upshot is Gonzales, ticketed maybe for the Supreme Court because he winked at torture and yessed the president. He's Kafka's man, Orwell's boy and Bush's pussycat. Know him for his roar...

I'm probably going to be stuck on all manner of Alberto Gonzales this week. In my previous thoughts on the topic, I opined that "the acceptance of torture and indefinite imprisonment without due process is not one of our (or America's) values". The posting kicked off a spirited discussion in the comments, some of it revolving around the concept of Gonzales' term as Attorney General (presupposing his confirmation) as being a stepping stone to a SCOTUS appointment in the future.

One point of view expressed is that progressives should lay off of Gonzales during the confirmation hearings, and let Cohen's scenario play out. The grounds for this argument is that Gonzales, by virtue of his ethnic / economic background, is potentially a liberal in conservative clothing. I respectfully decline to agree. Or, perhaps more pointedly, I've seen nothing in Gonzales' resume or actions while Whitehouse Counsel that would indicate any predisposition to protecting constitutionally guarenteed liberties, including the Bill of Rights.

When are people going to "get it" (progressives, neocons, and all viewpoints inbetween)? The crew that's in charge not only plans to continue a rewrite of history by staging their own realities, they are absolutely committed to a fundamental forced overhaul of the way America does business, both domestically and abroad. They're not content to let organic societal evolution occur as the world around us changes -- they want to be what's described in the business world as "change agents".

Change agents. Let this Michael Hammer / Harvard Business School terminology roll off of the back of your throat and migrate up to your cerebral cortex. Gonzales has already proven himself as a change agent in interpreting the rules of civilized treatment of detainees in the war on terra. He's totally changed the rules that were ratified in Geneva by the entire civilized planet in 1949. I don't need to be hit with a big stick to realize that this guy does not represent, and can not possibly represent, my viewpoints of government or the legal aspects of governance (two different animals).

Richard Cohen's editorial pretty much sums up my feeling on the Gonzales nomination. And as I noted in comments to my previous posting on the Senate confirmation hearings, I can not and will not recommend that anyone of the progressive persuasion sit by idly in the hope that Gonzales would have liberal leanings if his future is, indeed, on the Supreme Court.

I have no false illusions that any protestation of the Gonzales nomination is going to cause it to be derailed. But I'm not going to celebrate it or coat it with a veneer of hope. I'm going to speak out and recommend against it, both here and to the Senators from my state.

Because with "potential friends" like Al Gonzales, who needs enemies?

Decisions, Decisions. . . .

Jesus' General pointed us Monday to a place we can buy "Konservative Khristian Keepsakes."

Great mousepad, huh? I'm thinking that I've got this interview this morning at a "welfare to work" agency in North Philadelphia, just the right thing for a commie pinko liberal like myself. So, what do you think I take to using that for a mousepad were I to work there? Or maybe some KKK Cross coasters (below)? Yes, folks, there's a wide compendium of products here just waiting to warm your racist heart.

Frankly, I'm amazed that such a store can exist in this day and age, but as Jesus' General points out, the company doesn't link them off their regular web site, but off of an alternative front page: "index1.html." Somehow it is heartening to know that these folks realize that they are outside the bounds of civil discourse. (Boy I wish these pictures were clearer. Someone has to teach Cletus how to use that digital camera! He keeps pointing his finger instead of the camera. . . ba da dum!)

Anyway, it's never too early to do next year's Christmas shopping. Perhaps some of this stuff would look good in the White House?

Year of the Blog!

Yeah, it's been declared so by Editor and Publisher. What is not clear are the conclusions we should draw from this pronouncement.

To me this year of the BLOG has given me an outlet where, for the most part, I can express my outrage concerning the regression of American core values. Liberty for all and the fullest liberty that doesn't interfere with others seems like a fair description of some of our founding values. But just look on this page at the gay bashing Richard reports, and think -- our nation selected George Bush in part because he was against expanding those liberties to gays and lesbians. That's just one topic.

Outrage? Is that all this blog revolution should be about? I'll leave that to your comments, but I feel uncomfortable with a BLOG being merely a venue for outrage. According to that Pew study, BLOG readership increased 58% from February to November, but the key stat is here:

On the other hand, the study discovered that 62% still have no clear idea what a blog actually is.

What does that mean? We've got a very good opportunity to define further the notion of what a BLOG is and what it can do. Our collective BLOG track record is good, but the field is still open.

Monday, January 03, 2005

Support the Troops -vs- Saturday Night Queer Bashing

This has got to be some tough syrup to swallow for folks in Kentucky - where, oh, where can they stand? In defense of a patriotic warrior, or a stars-and-bars homo basher?

An assault that some have termed a hate crime because it happened outside a gay-friendly bar in Newport is scheduled to go to trial this week.

Steven Ard, 38, of Newport, is accused of attacking Matthew Ashcraft on the evening of June 26, following a dispute outside Woolly's on Monmouth Street. He is charged with assault and faces up to 20 years in prison.

Ashcraft, who is straight, and two gay friends were heading to the nightspot on June 26 when they saw Woolly's customer Leon Hughes being harassed outside. When Ashcraft intervened, Ard left, then returned with a baseball bat and beat him, Campbell County prosecutors said...

...Ashcraft, a 19-year-old National Guardsman in Ohio, said he saw Hughes being harassed about 10:30 p.m. June 26.

One of the assailants ran off during the fracas, but police said Ard returned to the scene after Ashcraft had seemingly defused the situation. Witnesses said Ard delivered a crushing blow across the back of Ashcraft's skull with the bat.

Other witnesses described trying to stop further violence by shielding Ashcraft's body with their own until police arrived. Ashcraft was released from University Hospital in Cincinnati July 1, where he was treated for skull fractures, cranial bleeding and a blood clot on his brain.

First off, let me give credit where credit is due: via Eschaton comments, Rorschach of No Capital picked this up on 365gay.com, and he and Tena of First Draft were discussing the topic, so I clicked through to find out what the deal was. And the truth is, the deal is so stereotypically red state-ish. This kind of crap is why Honest Abe shoulda let 'em go when he had the chance, because they're draggin' the rest of us down now. (Before you history buffs jump all over me, I know that Kentucky stayed in the Union - but they elected a secessionist state government...they just never made the jump official.)

In normal times, this would go down as just some homo bashing in Hooterville. But we all know this ain't normal times. You've got a straight National Guardsman who was hanging out with two gay friends, outside of a gay bar, getting involved in a fracas between a redneck and a queer. The straight Army guy who was defending the gay guy takes a Louisville Slugger to the base of his skull (and you just know the redneck had the bat in the jumpseat of his Dodge Ram Hemi). All of a sudden the stakes change.

This wasn't "boys will be boys". This was a group of bubbas lookin' to do a little hell raising and queer bashing on a Saturday night, and they got into a little more than they bargained for.

I've gotta ask - what would the police and prosecutorial response have been if the redneck simply bashed in the head of a queer? Would it have been the same if an alleged "straight" National Guardsman not been involved? Would the incident have made it beyond the police ledger in the Hooterville Republic Weekly?

You know the answer to that question.

So did Matt Sheppard.

Are we ever going to "grow up" as a nation?

Update, 1/4/05: Ok, you old coots. Get out your reading glasses. ;-) I acknowledged (bolded above) that Kentucky was not part of the Confederacy. I was making a point. Dammit.

The US Patron Saint...

P.T. Barnum Would Approve

It's one of those days. I found this dumbest quotes of 2004 thing at Alternet.org, which puts Phineus on my mind.

This is Number 25: "This is the best election night in history." -Democratic National Committee Chairman Terry McAuliffe, Nov. 2, 2004, just before 8 p.m. EST
Wanna guess what made Number 1?
Phineus T. Barnum was born on July 5, 1810. He was perhaps the quintessential promoter and showman. He knew about about the "belief systems" of human beings on the Happy Planet and made money accordingly. At my house we celebrate his birthday every year. We have for years. Here is a bio and the photo above, along with a shot of his gravesite. Another bio is here. This looks pretty good too.

The challenge is always, of course, battling the irrationality of groups of human beings, our lemming ancestry, always curious, but ever fearful. The challenge is also to remain a person whose center is your own self... guided by your own magnificent sensing appartuses and your own singular mind.

The more things change, the more they stay the same.

Action: Gonzales Confirmation

This coming Thursday, the Senate Judiciary Committee takes up confirmation hearings for Attorney General-in-waiting Alberto Gonzales. For the past few years, Gonzales' office (as the Whitehoue Attorney) has served as the justifier-in-chief for the current American Gulag scenario that I described yesterday. He's also the primary architect of the Bush War Crimes Torture Doctrine.

While I don't expect any Democrat to seriously challenge the Gonzales nomination, I do believe it's important that as many voices as possible be heard in opposition. Please join me in the following exercise:
  1. Read Digby's posting from yesterday on this issue.
  2. Read my posting below on the American Gulag situation.
  3. sukabi was kind enough to provide links for emailing all congressional representatives in this posting.
  4. Call or write to all members of the Senate Judiciary Committee.
If we learned nothing else from the tenure of John Ashcroft, it's that having an Attorney General who consistently renders decisions and directives that contravene the Bill of Rights and Constitution of the United States is not a good thing.

This will be the first occasion since the election that progressives really have the opportunity to make some noise on something that matters. While I'm not pollyanna-ish enough to believe than anything will derail the Gonzales confirmation, what I'd like to do is send a message not so much to the GOP rubber stamp members, but to the Democrat senators that sit on the committee - we will not stand by idly while ranking Dems in the senate continue the sellout of our moral values to the right.

The acceptance of torture and indefinite imprisonment without due process is not one of our (or America's) values.

An Uncommon Woman

In the fabric of what memory is left in my head from the late '60s / early '70s, Shirley Chisholm will always and forever be stitched together with both the civil rights and women's equality movements that gained steam during those heady times. In a manner of speaking, Ms. Chisholm was one part Rosa Parks, one part Gloria Steinem, and one part Angela Davis - though I doubt she'd want to be remembered exactly that way.

Shirley Chisholm died yesterday at the age of 80.

What was remarkable to me, as a young caucasian guy in the Nixonian early 1970's, was that a black woman - yes, a black woman - had the audacity to step into a white man's exclusive domain, and kick up some significant dust in a run at the presidency. We're not about talking a Carol Moseley-Braun token / protest run - we're talking about a full fledged, grassroots campaign that eventually gathered Ms. Chisholm 152 delegates to the Democratic National Convention in 1972.

Think about that for a moment.

At a time when Nixon's popularity was running very high (despite the looming Watergate scandal), "4 Dead in O-HI-O" was still in rotation on AM Top 40 radio stations, and the war in Vietnam was wheezing along on its last legs, an uppity negro woman from the Bedford-Stuy neighborhood of New York City gathered more momentum during the Democratic primaries than did John Edwards in 2004.

Above all, I remember Ms. Chisholm as having a keen sense of what was right, not what was black or white or brown or male or female. Pre-CSPAN, she was the outsider's insider, and truly the personification of LBJ's "Great Society". Her life's efforts went way beyond merely demolishing barriers (which is no doubt how she'll be eulogized in the coming days); her efforts provided entry to an exclusive club for an entire class of people underserved by their government.

Suffice it to say that the time in history during which Chisholm served in the House of Representatives coincided neatly with the formation of my own political compass.

Here's a link to a report on Shirley Chisholm's passing. If you're not terribly familiar with her story, I think you'll be surprised at some of the things she accomplished, and her political adroitness at getting what she wanted. Most importantly, she pressed for what she wanted for the right reasons.

I don't think you'll recognize many of the current Capitol Hill gang of thieves in the legacy of true public service that Ms. Chisholm leaves. In fact, I know you won't. Not one of them has her cast-iron force of will that was driven by a divinely inspired righteousness of cause.

Presidential Line of Succession, Rapture Ready?

White House Exploring 'Rapture' Contingency Plans
The White House is reportedly exploring contingency plans in the event that President Bush and other prominent Christians are 'raptured.' But succession plans are complicated by Vice President Dick Cheney's poor health and the fact that Representative Tom DeLay, like President Bush, will be summoned to heaven along with millions of other Christians.

Are you "Rapture Ready"? Well, are you?

Sunday, January 02, 2005

The More Things Change,

The More They Stay the Same.

Old adages aren't old adages for no good reason, ya know. I have to hope the one above goes without much saying. I have to hope, but still...

For the last 20 years I've been ongoingly alarmed by everything from a simple lack of vigilance on up to a callous indifference for what used to be called "women's issues", or "feminist issues". I remain appalled when I hear some woman use the sentence opening: "I'm not a feminist, but..." .

I came of age in a time when feminist thinking included that perhaps the first and ground-level "ism" on the Happy Planet was "sexism". Of course in more recent years I've come to know, as we've discussed in Richard's Last (Wo)man Standing thread downblog, that the polarizing and false dichotomizing of human beings and human concepts is the real culprit. The OTHER (not male and/or dominant) is the enemy of the dominant culture -- the status quo. That is in large part why sexism and racism look alike. Why a war on a country looks like what a battered woman endures at the hands of her husband. All are based on the same false polarities...

None of this is as a result of a "little problem" in human thinking and culture. It is THE problem with life on the happy Planet Patriarchy. What, at one time meant small important changes to women in the late 1960s and early 70s, has been washed into the background by the tsunami power of the dominant group's backlash against change of the status quo. Don't forget that one of the words used to describe the invasion and decimation of a country by conquerors is the same word used to describe the invasion and decimation of women -- rape.

All that preface done read this, the reason for the introductory adage in the first place: 'I reported the rape within 30 minutes - then watched my career implode', from a woman officer in the US Army.

"The worst thing for Captain Jennifer Machmer was knowing that the US army had actually promoted her rapist. Four years in the military, from proud passing out at West Point to humiliating discharge, had provided an education into the Pentagon's thinking on sexual assault in the ranks, but Machmer never expected an accused rapist to be rewarded.

Her story, narrated to a hushed Congressional committee chamber in April this year, was a rare first-person account of the dangers faced by women soldiers during the Iraq war from their fellow troops. With thousands of women on the front line of America's war on terror, the Pentagon has been forced to acknowledge that female soldiers are at risk from their comrades in arms, and that, in the US military, rapists often go unpunished."

That women ever succumbed to the silly notion that joining the military somehow made them "equal" with men remains a mystery to me. I understand the brilliant sales job however... the dominant group has always invited the outgroup INTO the inner sanctum in order to subvert momentum. That women still refuse to see that a "Pentagon"-like war and violence organization will never prevent their rape by members of their own is mind-boggling. Staggering.

I hope the younger women of the happy Planet Patriarchy continue to remember that rape is not about "sex". Never. Rape of women by men, rape of nations, the environment, all of it is always about power... those who have it and those who don't.

No Trial, No Parole

But a Lifetime Supply of BushCo Butt Pyramids©

The Pentagon and the CIA have asked the White House to decide on a more permanent approach for those it was unwilling to set free or turn over to U.S. or foreign courts, the Washington Post said in a report that cited intelligence, defense and diplomatic officials.

Some detentions could potentially last a lifetime, the newspaper said...

Yeah, "they" hate us. Is it any wonder?

What gets a guy (or gal or kid) hauled off to one of the U.S. offshore gulags? Being caught in the act of wiring a car bomb or IED? Being asleep in bed at night when a U.S. Special Forces unit kicks down the door, because a neighbor with a grudge over fence color ratted him out? Walking down the side of the road with a Kalashnikov slung over the shoulder as a U.S. convoy passes by? I don't know. But that's the point. No one knows. It's all very hush-hush.

It appears more and more that the U.S. gulags, out of the apparent reach of the domestic U.S. justice system by virtue of being offshore, are now a permanent fixture in the shadowy underpinnings of the American intelligence apparatus. There is no "justice" to be meted out in this system, and there was never meant to be.

I'm not advocating a wholesale release of detainees from all of the U.S. gulags, but most certainly, there has to be an accounting of who's being held and why. No doubt the accounting does in fact exist somewhere, but the whole thing is all so nebulous. There also has to be a limit to the value of any "intelligence" that could be gained from someone who's been incarcerated for 3+ years.

Here's the deal: the reason that many (or most) of these PEOPLE will be behind concertina wire for the rest of their lives is that they have stories to tell from inside the gulags. Some of the stories have already leaked out, but have been mostly portrayed by the MSM as fantasies from bad actors.

Maybe so - but there's enough commonality to the tales of torture, abuse, neglect, and natural rights violations that there has to be some connection to a modicum of detention reality. What's simply confounding to me is that the U.S. public, via instructions from the MSM, wouldn't stand for such a thing happening anywhere else in the world by any other government on such a large scale (I know, I know, it happens every day, but not on this scale, and not "in our names").

Yet there are untold thousands of men, women and (yes) children being detained in a legal no-man's land. Al Gonzales and a stable of Heritage Foundation-schooled lawyers may be able to twist logic and jurisprudence in justifying the actions of the U.S. government, but they're sure as hell violating Mother Cranium's First Law of Righteousness:

If it doesn't feel right, it's probably wrong.

Update, 1/3/05: I'm not really a Lew Rockwell kind of guy, but I've been reading Justin Raimondo's work for quite some time at antiwar.com. Today, Justin writes an extended column that riffs a bit on the concepts presented above - but also provides some perspective in how we've arrived at this point.

We the People

In the past couple of weeks I've posted election theft links and petitions. Today I'm posting a letter to my Senators.

Dear Senators Murray and Cantwell,

In the past couple of weeks and days you have no doubt been bombarded with email and petitions requesting that you contest the vote in the last presidential election. I’m adding my voice to that chorus. This is not a frivolous request. It is not a request born out of partisan sour grapes, but out of concern for the very democracy our government is supposed to represent.

After the presidential election of 2000, the ensuing recount debacle and the Supreme Court intervention in the election process the HAVA legislation was passed. While the legislation may have been well intentioned, the consequences of that legislation have been devastating to the fabric of democracy. So what did the Help America Vote Act accomplish? It enabled more unverified voting to take place in the form of “voting technology”. We now have touch screen boxes, optical scanners and tabulators recording and counting our votes. Why is this a problem? It’s a problem because the companies that produce, maintain and calibrate the equipment do NOT allow the source code to be examined or tested by impartial experts. It’s a problem because the companies that produce that equipment set up the certification tests the state(s) use(s) to certify the equipment that record and count our votes. It’s a problem because there is no auditable paper trail in the case of a recount. It’s a problem because, in the case of the few machines that do produce a receipt, there is no way to verify that what is printed on the receipt is actually what the machine recorded.

Prior to the election there were several reports of groups that were moving from state to state, registering voters of one party and destroying the voter registration forms of members of the opposing party (google search). Several states (google search) purged voter rolls of eligible voters, based on flawed felon lists. A couple of Secretaries of State, while involved in the campaign of one candidate were actively interpreting laws to favor one party over another. Those are all acts of voter suppression. Why is this a big deal? The soul of democracy depends on equal representation, by disenfranchising one voter or group of voters there is no democracy. That was a problem our fore fathers had with their King George. No representation.

Since the votes were cast on Nov. 2 there have been numerous problems in many states with the vote counts and totals. The major media outlets have ignored these issues and have passed them off as conspiracy theories when they do get a mention. These are very real issues and deserve a full investigation. In Ohio there have been several suits filed by the presidential candidates to preserve vote counts, tallies, and other evidence in the recount that has taken place. There is evidence of voter suppression, in the form of long lines and lack of voting equipment that was provided in some lower income, heavily populated districts while an abundance of equipment was available in less populated affluent districts. There is evidence of vote tampering by the vote technology companies.

Rep. Conyers believes that there is enough concern to have held hearings on these issues. Based on those hearings Rep. Conyers is asking for the senate to challenge and investigate the Ohio vote. I’m lending my voice to his. Challenge and investigate the vote.

It is past time that every eligible voter can cast their vote and have it counted. It is past time that this country, which holds itself up as the beacon of democracy, has non-partisan, transparent, auditable elections. It’s time that “We the people” of this country are represented. Challenge and investigate the vote.

Sincerely,

Sukabi

Send a letter to your senator.

Update - Here's another resource for letter writing (sample letters), fax to email services, and phone numbers of some of the senators, plus links to other sites covering vote fraud issues. Vote Fraud News.com

Your Turn

It's been awhile since we ran an open thread to see what's bugging our readers -- since this seems to be a slow weekend (even though I have a couple of things in pipeline), please, belly up to the bar and buy everyone a round! What's on your mind?

Me? I absolutely loved this image found on the dKos front page this morning:


Got Miles? Donate Them for Tsunami Relief.

I think I have a frequent flier account for just about every U.S. airline that's been in the air over the past 10 or 15 years. It's become habit. If I fly any airline for the first time, I'll sign up for their member's program whether or not I ever intend to fly that airline again. The end result is that I've accumulated quite a few accounts with just a few thousand miles.

Webflyer.com has a great idea for putting those unused miles to work - donate them to one of the relief organizations working to get boots on the ground in areas affected by the Indian Ocean tsunami.

Here's a link for more information.

Saturday, January 01, 2005

Rudy :: Colin

Remember how Rudy Giuliani rehab'd his image in the immediate aftermath of Sept. 11th, 2001?

I think Colin Powell found his 9/11 in the Asian disaster. For the past 3 or 4 days, he's been far and away the most visible member of the Bush administration's tsunami response. Listen, I don't hold this against him; I'm just glad someone finally got off their ass after it took Maximum Leader 3 days to poke his head out of his spider hole in Crawford to make a comment.

Still, Powell will forever be one of the most culpable members in the administration for his handling of the runup to the Iraq debacle. Most progressives will never forget.

That won't stop the Giuliani-style GOP image makeover currently underway as Colin heads for the exits...

You have to wonder - what would his successor Condi do in a similar situation? Perhaps someone should ask during her confirmation hearings lovefest?

Dawning

I like this.

I open my eyes this morning, and the world's still spinning on its axis, regardless of how much said axis might have been shifted post-Asian earthquake.

It's warm like a spring day on the East Coast. In years past, the weathermen would have referred to a day like this as "January thaw" - one of those rare opportunities in the middle of winter to recover from snow, ice, and other sundry miserable weather conditions. The mild weather of the past fall and current winter have certainly been unusual in my neck of the woods, but then, that's been a good thing for my heating bill (and energy prices in general, I suppose).

So, I think I'll get the cars washed today, and do some minor yard maintenance. Nothing heavy duty -- the gift of a day like this was meant to be enjoyed, not spent in significant domestic toil.

And then I stop for a moment.

Why does this conflict me so much?

My wife (M) prepared a wonderful breakfast this morning. While we were eating, a reporter on TV was talking about 'miracles in Somalia', and showing a young boy in the hospital who had survived the tsunami. His mother was by his side. M remarked how old the woman looked to be the mother of a boy so young.

Offhanded response by me? "Life is tough in a lot of places on the planet, dear. The simple act of living ages people quickly in these countries."

I'm so damn lucky.

Forks in the road of life are reached with lesser epiphanies. Personal changes are coming in the next 365 days. I can feel it like the cold, grey stillness before a Nor'easter blows in...